AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

He’s asking the Sangha for a purifying probation for those offenses. If the Sangha is ready, it should give him a that purifying probation. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk so-and-so has committed a number of offenses entailing suspension. He doesn’t know the number of offenses or the number of days; he doesn’t remember the number of offenses or the number of days; he’s unsure of the number of offenses and the number of days. He’s asking the Sangha for purifying probation for those offenses. The Sangha gives him that purifying probation.

First you must plow the fields, then sow the seeds, Next you must cut the harvest, gather it together, and make sheaves. You must then thresh it, remove the straw and then winnow it before you bring it into storage. And next year you must do the same, and the next.”

but the monk himself informs him that he has been seen, heard, or suspected of failure in view. Then, on the observance day, whether the fourteenth or the fifteenth, he may if he wishes, based on what he has seen, has heard, or suspects, announce in the midst of the Sangha and in the presence of that person: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. So-and-so has been seen, heard, or suspected of failure in view. I cancel his hearing of the Monastic Code. The Monastic Code shouldn’t be recited in his presence.’ This cancellation of the Monastic Code is legitimate. These are the ten legitimate cancellations of the Monastic Code.” The first section for recitation is finished. 7. The qualities needed to raise an issue Venerable Upāli went to the Buddha, bowed, sat down,

‘He is a Buddha, perfected and fully awakened, complete in insight and conduct, happy, knower of the world, supreme leader of trainable people, teacher of gods and humans, awakened, a Buddha. With his own insight he has seen this world with its gods, its lords of death, and its supreme beings, this society with its monastics and brahmins, its gods and humans, and he makes it known to others. He has a Teaching that’s good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end. It has a true goal and is well articulated. He sets out a perfectly complete and pure spiritual life.’ It’s good to see such perfected ones.” Then, accompanied by one hundred and twenty thousand brahmin householders from Magadha, King Bimbisāra went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down. Among those brahmins, some bowed to the Buddha and then sat down, some exchanged pleasantries with him and then sat down, some raised their joined palms and then sat down, some announced their name and family and then sat down, and some sat down in silence. “Is the Great Ascetic practicing the spiritual life under Uruvelā Kassapa, or is Uruvelā Kassapa practicing the spiritual life under the Great Ascetic?” Reading their minds, the Buddha spoke to Venerable Uruvelā Kassapa in verse: “The resident of Uruvelā, known as The Emaciated One— What did he see that he abandoned the fire?

On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘May they get lost! May they disappear! We are better off without them.’ They then do the invitation ceremony, aiming at schism. While they’re doing it, an equal number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, but the others should invite. And there’s a serious offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘May they get lost! May they disappear! We are better off without them.’

merely by sewing a hem, merely by marking with a strip of cloth, merely by strengthening, merely by adding a border lengthwise, merely by adding a border crosswise, merely by patching, merely by partial dyeing; nor has it been performed if a monk has made an indication, if a monk has given a hint, if the robe-cloth has been borrowed,

and the Sangha isn’t at fault. If a unanimous Sangha does a legal procedure with questioning that should be done with questioning, does a legal procedure with admission that should be done with admission, applies resolution through recollection to one deserving resolution through recollection, applies resolution because of past insanity to one deserving resolution because of past insanity, does a legal procedure of further penalty against one deserving a procedure of further penalty, does a legal procedure of condemnation against one deserving a procedure of condemnation, does a legal procedure of demotion against one deserving a procedure of demotion, does a legal procedure of banishment against one deserving a procedure of banishment, does a legal procedure of reconciliation against one deserving a procedure of reconciliation,

He shouldn’t cancel the observance-day ceremony of a regular monk. He shouldn’t cancel the invitation ceremony of a regular monk. He shouldn’t direct a regular monk. He shouldn’t give instructions to a regular monk. He shouldn’t get permission from a regular monk to correct him. He shouldn’t accuse a regular monk of an offense. He shouldn’t remind a regular monk of an offense. He shouldn’t associate inappropriately with other monks.” The eighteen kinds of conduct in regard to the legal procedure of reconciliation are finished. Soon afterwards the Sangha did a legal procedure of reconciliation against the monk Sudhamma,

Any monk who approves of giving him that purifying probation should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. … The Sangha has given monk so-and-so a purifying probation for those offenses. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’ When to give purifying probation “When should purifying probation be given? It should be given: when one doesn’t know the number of offenses, nor the number of days; when one doesn’t remember the number of offenses, nor the number of days;

“Sir, if a monk wishes to raise an issue, what factors should be fulfilled?” “Five factors should be fulfilled: He should reflect whether it’s the right time to raise it. it’s the wrong time, he shouldn’t raise it. But if he knows it’s the right time, he should reflect further whether it’s a real issue. it’s not, he shouldn’t raise it. But if he knows

They then do the invitation ceremony, aiming at schism. While they’re doing it, a smaller number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, but the others should invite. And there’s a serious offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘May they get lost! May they disappear! We are better off without them.’ They then do the invitation ceremony, aiming at schism. When they’ve just finished, a greater number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, those monks should do the invitation ceremony once more.

if it has been stored, if it is to be relinquished, if it hasn’t been marked, if it’s not an outer robe or an upper robe nor has it been performed if the robe hasn’t been made on that very day with five or more cut sections with panels, if the robe-making ceremony wasn’t performed by an individual, or if the robe-making ceremony has been performed correctly but the appreciation for the ceremony was expressed outside the monastery zone. In this way the robe-making ceremony hasn’t been performed. And how has the robe-making ceremony been performed?

does a legal procedure of ejection against one deserving a procedure of ejection, gives probation to one deserving probation, sends back to the beginning one deserving to be sent back to the beginning, gives the trial period to one deserving the trial period, rehabilitates one deserving rehabilitation, or gives full ordination to one deserving full ordination, that procedure is legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and the Sangha isn’t at fault.” “If, sir, a unanimous Sangha applies resolution because of past insanity to one deserving resolution through recollection and applies resolution through recollection to one deserving resolution because of past insanity, is that a legitimate procedure, in accordance with the Monastic Law?” “That legal procedure, Upāli, is illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law.” “If a unanimous Sangha does a procedure of further penalty against one deserving resolution because of past insanity and applies resolution because of past insanity to one deserving a procedure of further penalty,

when one is unsure of the number of offenses and the number of days. It should be given: when one knows the number of offenses, but not the number of days; when one remembers the number of offenses, but not the number of days; when one is sure of the number of offenses, but not the number of days. It should be given: when one knows some of the offenses but not others, and not the number of days; when one remembers some of the offenses but not others, and not the number of days; when one is sure of some of the offenses but not others, and not the number of days. It should be given: when one doesn’t know the number of offenses, but one knows some of the days but not others; when one doesn’t remember the number of offenses, but one remembers some of the days but not others; when one is unsure of the number of offenses, but one is sure of some of the days but not others.

“I allow a bag for sandals.” There was no shoulder strap. “I allow a shoulder strap and a string for fastening it.” While they were traveling, there was only unallowable water, but no water filter. “I allow a water filter.” There was no suitable cloth. “I allow a filter with a handle.” There was still no suitable cloth. “I allow a water strainer.”

it is, he should reflect further whether raising it will be beneficial. it won’t, he shouldn’t raise it. But if he knows it will, he should reflect further whether the monks who are on the side of the Teaching and the Monastic Law will support him. that they won’t, he shouldn’t raise it. But if he knows that they will, he should reflect further whether raising the issue will lead to arguments and disputes, to fracture and schism in the Sangha.

And there’s a serious offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘May they get lost! May they disappear! We are better off without them.’ They then do the invitation ceremony, aiming at schism. When they’ve just finished, an equal number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, and the late arrivals should invite in the presence of the others. And there’s a serious offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived.

does a procedure of condemnation against one deserving a procedure of further penalty and does a procedure of further penalty against one deserving a procedure of condemnation, does a procedure of demotion against one deserving a procedure of condemnation and does a procedure of condemnation against one deserving a procedure of demotion, does a procedure of banishment against one deserving a procedure of demotion and does a procedure of demotion against one deserving a procedure of banishment, does a procedure of reconciliation against one deserving a procedure of banishment and does a procedure of banishment against one deserving a procedure of reconciliation, does a procedure of ejection against one deserving a procedure of reconciliation and does a procedure of reconciliation against one deserving a procedure of ejection, gives probation to one deserving a procedure of ejection and does a procedure of ejection against one deserving probation, sends back to the beginning one deserving probation and gives probation to one deserving to be sent back to the beginning, gives the trial period to one deserving to be sent back to the beginning and sends back to the beginning one deserving the trial period, rehabilitates one deserving the trial period and gives the trial period to one deserving rehabilitation, or gives full ordination to one deserving rehabilitation and rehabilitates one deserving to be given full ordination, is that a legitimate procedure, in accordance with the Monastic Law?”

First you should ask a monk, and then a competent and capable monk should inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. If the Sangha is ready, it should give monk so-and-so to Sudhamma as a companion messenger to ask Citta for forgiveness. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha gives monk so-and-so to Sudhamma as a companion messenger to ask Citta for forgiveness. Any monk who approves of this should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. The Sangha has given monk so-and-so to Sudhamma as a companion messenger to ask Citta for forgiveness. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’

It should be given: when one knows the number of offenses, and one knows some of the days but not others; when one remembers the number of offenses, and one remembers some of the days but not others; when one is sure of the number of offenses, and one is sure of some of the days but not others. It should be given: when one knows some of the offenses but not others, and one knows some of the days but not others; when one remembers some of the offenses but not others, and one remembers some of the days but not others; when one is sure of some of the offenses but not others, and one is sure of some of the days but not others.” When to give regular probation