AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

Scented, and purgative, Clear congee, mung-bean broth, oily mung-bean broth. Meat broth, hillside, Monastery, and with seven days; Sugar, mung beans, and purgative, Cooking oneself, reheating. He allowed again, when short of food, And fruit, sesame, fresh food; Before eating, fever, And removed, hemorrhoids.

then the legal procedure is legitimate. It may be that a monk has an offense he needs to make amends for, and a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You’ve committed an offense. Make amends for it.’ ‘I haven’t committed any offense that I should make amends for,’ and the Sangha ejects him for not making amends for an offense, then the legal procedure is legitimate. It may be that a monk has a bad view he needs to give up, and a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You have a bad view that you need to give up.’

and thinks, ‘Let me ask the Sangha for probation for an additional month for those two offenses.’ Counting the previous month, that monk must stay on probation for two months. It may be that a monk has committed two offenses entailing suspension, both concealed for two months. He’s sure of one month, but unsure of the other. He asks the Sangha for one month probation for the month he’s sure of, While on probation, he becomes sure of the other month. He considers all this and thinks, ‘Let me ask the Sangha for probation for an additional month for those two offenses.’ Counting the previous month, that monk must stay on probation for two months. “It may be that a monk has committed two offenses entailing suspension, both concealed for two months.

‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. There’s an unfinished discussion about so-and-so renouncing the training. The case hasn’t been decided. If the Sangha is ready, it should decide it.’ If this works out, all is well. If not, then on the observance day, whether the fourteenth or the fifteenth, in the midst of the Sangha and in the presence of that person, a monk should announce: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. There’s an unfinished discussion about so-and-so renouncing the training. The case hasn’t been decided. I cancel his hearing of the Monastic Code. The Monastic Code shouldn’t be recited in his presence.’ This cancellation of the Monastic Code is legitimate.” One who reopens a legitimate legal procedure

While they’re doing it, a greater number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, those monks should do the invitation ceremony once more. There’s an offense of wrong conduct for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘Is it allowable for us to do the invitation ceremony or not?’ Being unsure, they do the invitation ceremony. While they’re doing it, an equal number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, but the others should invite. There’s an offense of wrong conduct for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery.

And enema, and Suppi, And human flesh; Elephant, horse, and dog, Snake, lion, leopard. Bear, and hyena flesh, And turn, and congee; Recent, apart from, sugar, Sunidha, guesthouse. Ganges, Koṭi, speaking the truths, And Ambapālī, Licchavī;

‘I don’t have any bad view that I should give up,’ and the Sangha ejects him for not giving up a bad view, then the legal procedure is legitimate. It may be that a monk has an offense he needs to recognize and an offense he needs to make amends for … an offense he needs to recognize and a bad view he needs to give up … an offense he needs to make amends for and a bad view he needs to give up … an offense he needs to recognize, an offense he needs to make amends for, and a bad view he needs to give up, and a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You’ve committed an offense. Do you recognize it? Make amends for it.

“I allow a frame and a string. You should tie down the cloth to the frame as required, before sewing the robe.” They laid the frame on uneven ground. The frame broke. “You shouldn’t lay the frame on uneven ground. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” They laid the frame on the ground. The frame became dirty. “I allow a spread of grass.” The edges of the frame deteriorated. “I allow you to add an edge lengthwise and crosswise.”

“And how does he not go to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly? A monk sees in a monk the characteristics and signs of someone who doesn’t go to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Or a monk doesn’t see a monk not going to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly, but another monk informs him that monk so-and-so didn’t go to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Or a monk doesn’t see a monk not going to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly, nor does another monk inform him, but the monk himself informs him that he didn’t go to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Then, on the observance day, whether the fourteenth or the fifteenth, he may if he wishes, based on what he has seen, has heard, or suspects, announce in the midst of the Sangha and in the presence of that person: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. So-and-so didn’t go to a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. I cancel his hearing of the Monastic Code. The Monastic Code shouldn’t be recited in his presence.’

there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘Is it allowable for us to do the invitation ceremony or not?’ Being unsure, they do the invitation ceremony. While they’re doing it, a smaller number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, but the others should invite. There’s an offense of wrong conduct for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. They think, ‘Is it allowable for us to do the invitation ceremony or not?’ Being unsure, they do the invitation ceremony. When they’ve just finished … When they’ve just finished, and none of the gathering has left …

Killed for, plenty of food, He prohibited again. Storm, Yasa, and Meṇḍaka, Product of a cow, and with provisions; Keṇi, mango, rose apple, bananas with seeds, Seedless bananas, licorice, grapes, lotus tubers. Falsa fruit, potherbs, flour, At Ātuma, barber; At Sāvatthī, fruit, seed, And about all sorts of matters, in the time period.”

And you have a bad view that you need to give up.’ ‘I haven’t committed any offense that I should recognize, nor any I should make amends for, nor do I have any bad view that I should give up,’ and the Sangha ejects him for not recognizing an offense, for not making amends for an offense, or for not giving up a bad view, then the legal procedure is legitimate.” 8. The discussion of Upāli’s questions On one occasion Venerable Upāli went to the Buddha, bowed, sat down, “If, sir, a unanimous Sangha doesn’t do a legal procedure face-to-face that should be done face-to-face, is that a legitimate procedure, in accordance with the Monastic Law?” “That legal procedure, Upāli, is illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law.”

Any monk who approves of doing this legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. The Sangha has done the legal procedure of reconciliation against the monk Sudhamma, instructing him to ask Citta for forgiveness. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” The group of twelve on illegitimate legal procedures “When a legal procedure of reconciliation has three qualities, it’s illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done in the absence of the accused, it’s done without questioning the accused, it’s done without the admission of the accused. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t committed any offense, it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that isn’t clearable by confession, it’s done against one who’s confessed their offense.

And cloth, skin, round cloth, Cloth, and they stepped. Wet, sandals, spitting, They spoiled, and they leaned; The leaning board scratched, Washed, and with a sheet. In Rājagaha they were unable, Inferior, a designator of meals; How, an assigner, Appointment of a storeman.

This cancellation of the Monastic Code is legitimate.” “And how does he reopen a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly? A monk sees in a monk the characteristics and signs of someone who reopens a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Or a monk doesn’t see a monk reopening a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly, but another monk informs him that monk so-and-so has reopened a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Or a monk doesn’t see a monk reopening a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly, nor does another monk inform him, but the monk himself informs him that he has reopened a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. Then, on the observance day, whether the fourteenth or the fifteenth, he may if he wishes, based on what he has seen, has heard, or suspects, announce in the midst of the Sangha and in the presence of that person: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. So-and-so has reopened a legitimate legal procedure of a complete assembly. I cancel his hearing of the Monastic Code. The Monastic Code shouldn’t be recited in his presence.’ This cancellation of the Monastic Code is legitimate. When the Monastic Code has been canceled for a monk, it may be that the gathering breaks up because of any one of ten threats:

If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. You should abolish one of them and do the observance-day ceremony in one place. And it should be abolished like this. A competent and capable monk should inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. If the Sangha is ready, it should abolish such-and-such an observance-day hall. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha abolishes such-and-such an observance-day hall. Any monk who approves of abolishing such-and-such an observance-day hall should remain silent.

In this chapter there are one hundred and six topics. The chapter on medicines is finished.

“If a unanimous Sangha does a procedure without questioning that should be done with questioning, does a procedure without admission that should be done with admission, applies resolution because of past insanity to one deserving resolution through recollection, does a procedure of further penalty against one deserving resolution because of past insanity, does a procedure of condemnation against one deserving a procedure of further penalty, does a procedure of demotion against one deserving a procedure of condemnation, does a procedure of banishment against one deserving a procedure of demotion, does a procedure of reconciliation against one deserving a procedure of banishment, does a procedure of ejection against one deserving a procedure of reconciliation, gives probation to one deserving a procedure of ejection,

When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having accused the person of their offense, it’s done without having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done without having charged the person with their offense. “When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done in the absence of the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without questioning the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without the admission of the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. “When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t committed any offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that isn’t clearable by confession, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s confessed their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. “When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having accused the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of reconciliation has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having charged the person with their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly.”

There were monks who stepped on the frame with wet feet. The frame became dirty. “You shouldn’t step on the frame with wet feet. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” There were monks who stepped on the frame while wearing sandals. The frame became dirty. “You shouldn’t step on the frame while wearing sandals. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” When sewing robes, the monks used their bare fingers. They pricked their fingers.