AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

Soon afterwards he had the Sangha gathered and questioned the monks: “Is it true, monks, that the teachers are not conducting themselves properly toward their pupils?” “It’s true, sir.” … After rebuking them … the Buddha gave a teaching and addressed the monks: “Well then, I’ll lay down the proper conduct for a teacher toward his pupil. A teacher should conduct himself properly toward his pupil. This is the proper conduct: A teacher should help and take care of his pupil through recitation, questioning, and instruction. If the teacher has a bowl, but not the pupil, the teacher should give it to him,

for which gentlemen rightly go forth into homelessness.” The Buddha was able to persuade the group of five monks. They then listened to the Buddha, paid careful attention, and applied their minds to understand. And the Buddha addressed them: “There are these two opposites that should not be pursued by one who has gone forth. One is the devotion to worldly pleasures, which is inferior, crude, common, ignoble, and unbeneficial. The other is the devotion to self-torment, which is painful, ignoble, and unbeneficial. By avoiding these opposites, I have awakened to the middle path, which produces vision and knowledge, which leads to peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment. And what, monks, is that middle path? It’s just this noble eightfold path, that is, right view, right aim, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right stillness.

But he stays away for more than seven days. The first rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing. … After staying there for two or three days, he leaves on seven-day business. And he returns within seven days. The first rains residence does count for that monk. And there’s no offense for agreeing. … Seven days before the invitation ceremony, he leaves on seven-day business. Whether he returns to that monastery or not, the first rains residence does count for that monk. And there’s no offense for agreeing.” The second rains residence: observance-day outside monastery “It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard.

Saying, “Yes, sir,” he did as requested. He then said to the Buddha, “I’ve given the monks as much sugar as they need, but there’s much left over. What should I do with that?” “Give the monks as much sugar as they want.” Saying, “Yes, sir,” he again did as requested. Some monks filled their almsbowls and even their water filters and bags. When he was finished, he said to the Buddha, “I’ve given the monks as much sugar as they want, but there’s much left over. What should I do with that?” “Give to those who live on scraps.”

it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done with the admission of the accused. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done against one who hasn’t confessed their offense. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done after accusing the person of their offense, it’s done after reminding the person of their offense, it’s done after charging the person with their offense. “When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of:

When he had completed that probation, while deserving the trial period, he committed one unconcealed offense of intentional emission of semen. He’s asking the Sangha to send him back to the beginning for that offense. The Sangha sends him back to the beginning. Any monk who approves of sending him back to the beginning should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. … The Sangha has sent the monk Udāyī back to the beginning for one unconcealed offense of intentional emission of semen, committed while deserving the trial period. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” Trial period for the three offenses

Their purpose is to shelter and for happiness, To attain absorption and to see clearly. Giving dwellings to the Sangha Is praised as the best by the Buddha. Therefore the wise man, Seeing what’s beneficial for himself, Should build delightful dwellings And have the learned stay there. Food, drink, cloth, and dwellings— With an inspired mind,

Venerable, let’s take on this legal issue— before what’s contrary to the Teaching shines forth and the Teaching is obstructed; before what’s contrary to the Monastic Law shines forth and the Monastic Law is obstructed; before those who speak contrary to the Teaching become strong and those who speak in accordance with it become weak; before those who speak contrary to the Monastic Law become strong and those who speak in accordance with it become weak.” Saying, “Yes,” he consented to Yasa’s request. The first section for recitation is finished. Both sides gathering supporters The Vajjian monks of Vesālī heard: “It seems Yasa wants to take on this legal issue and is looking for supporters. And it seems he is gaining support.”

to a hunchback, to someone with goiter, to someone who has been branded, to someone who has been whipped, to a wanted criminal, to someone with elephantiasis, to someone with a serious sickness, to someone with abnormal appearance, to someone blind in one eye, to someone with a crooked limb,

He then leaves on that very day, despite not having any business. The second rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing. It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. He then leaves on that very day because of business. The second rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing. It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. After staying there for two or three days, he leaves, despite not having any business. The second rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing.

Saying, “Yes, sir,” he again did as requested. He then said to the Buddha, “I’ve given them sugar, but there’s much left over. What should I do with that?” “Give them as much sugar as they need.” Saying, “Yes, sir,” he again did as requested. He then said to the Buddha, “I’ve given them as much sugar as they need, but there’s much left over. What should I do with that?” “Give them as much sugar as they want.” Saying, “Yes, sir,” he once again did as requested. Some of those who lived on scraps filled basins, waterpots, and baskets, and some even their laps.

it’s improperly taken. But if he takes it on trust from the intended recipient, it’s properly taken. It may be that a monk gives a robe to a monk to take to yet another monk, saying, ‘I give this robe to so-and-so.’ If, while on his way, he takes it on trust from the intended recipient, it’s properly taken. But if he takes it on trust from the sender, it’s improperly taken. It may be that a monk gives a robe to a monk to take to yet another monk, saying,

it’s done with the admission of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. “When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t confessed their offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. “When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done after accusing the person of their offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of condemnation has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of:

that is, right view, right aim, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right stillness. I knew that this is the noble truth of suffering. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of suffering should be fully understood. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of suffering had been fully understood. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this is the noble truth of the origin of suffering. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the origin of suffering should be fully abandoned. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the origin of suffering had been fully abandoned. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this is the noble truth of the end of suffering. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the end of suffering should be fully experienced. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the end of suffering had been fully experienced. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before.

It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. After staying there for two or three days, he leaves because of business. The second rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing. It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. After staying there for two or three days, he leaves on seven-day business. But he stays away for more than seven days. The second rains residence doesn’t count for that monk. And there’s an offense of wrong conduct for agreeing. It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery.

which it did. … I’ve now completed that probation and ask the Sangha for the trial period of six days for the three offenses.’ And he should ask a second and a third time. A competent and capable monk should then inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk Udāyī had committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. … He’s now completed that probation and is asking the Sangha for the trial period of six days for the three offenses. If the Sangha is ready, it should give him that trial period. This is the motion.

“Who speak in accordance with the Teaching— the monks from the east or the monks from Pāvā?” Reflecting on the Teaching and the Monastic Law, it occurred to him, “The monks from the east speak contrary to the Teaching, but the monks from Pāvā don’t.” Just then a god from the pure abodes read Sāḷha’s mind. Then, just as a strong man might bend or stretch his arm, he disappeared from pure abodes and appeared in front of Sāḷha. And he said to Sāḷha, “You’re right, Venerable Sāḷha. The monks from the east speak contrary to the Teaching, but the monks from Pāvā don’t. So then, take a stand in accordance with the Teaching.” “I’ve always taken a stand in accordance with the Teaching.

I knew that this is the noble truth of the path leading to the end of suffering. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the path leading to the end of suffering should be fully developed. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. I knew that this noble truth of the path leading to the end of suffering had been fully developed. Vision, knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and light arose in me regarding things I had never heard before. So long as I had not fully purified my knowledge and vision according to reality of these four noble truths with their three stages and twelve characteristics, I didn’t claim the supreme full awakening in this world with its gods, lords of death, and supreme beings, in this society with its monastics and brahmins, its gods and humans. But when I had fully purified my knowledge and vision according to reality of these four noble truths with their three stages and twelve characteristics, then I did claim the supreme full awakening in this world with its gods, lords of death, and supreme beings, in this society with its monastics and brahmins, its gods and humans. And knowledge and vision arose in me: ‘My freedom is unshakable, this is my last birth, now there is no further rebirth.’” This is what the Buddha said. The monks from the group of five were pleased and they rejoiced in the Buddha’s exposition. And while this exposition was being spoken, Venerable Koṇḍañña experienced the stainless vision of the Truth: “Anything that has a beginning has an end.”

While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. After staying there for two or three days, he leaves on seven-day business. And he returns within seven days. The second rains residence does count for that monk. And there’s no offense for agreeing. It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery. While on his way to that monastery, he does the observance-day ceremony outside. On the following day, he enters and prepares the dwelling, sets out water for drinking and water for washing, and sweeps the yard. Seven days before Komudī, the fourth full-moon day of the rainy season, he leaves because of business. Whether he returns to that monastery or not, the second rains residence does count for that monk. And there’s no offense for agreeing.” The second rains residence: observance-day within monastery “It may happen that a monk agrees to spend the second rains residence in a particular monastery.

Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk Udāyī had committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. … He’s now completed that probation and is asking the Sangha for the trial period of six days for the three offenses. The Sangha gives him that trial period. Any monk who approves of giving him the trial period of six days should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. … The Sangha has given the monk Udāyī the trial period of six days for the three offenses. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’”