AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

Legal procedures deficient in announcement but complete in motion are invalid and not to be done. Legal procedures deficient in both motion and announcement are invalid and not to be done. Legal procedures not done according to the Teaching are invalid and not to be done. Legal procedures not done according to the Monastic Law are invalid and not to be done. Legal procedures not done according to the Teacher’s instructions are invalid and not to be done. Legal procedures that have been objected to, that are illegitimate, reversible, and unfit to stand are invalid and not to be done. And, monks, there are six kinds of legal procedures: illegitimate legal procedures, legal procedures done by an incomplete assembly, legal procedures done by a unanimous assembly, legitimate-like legal procedures done by an incomplete assembly, legitimate-like legal procedures done by a unanimous assembly, legitimate legal procedures done by a unanimous assembly. What’s an illegitimate legal procedure? If a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they do it with one motion and no announcement, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure.

The Sangha lifts that legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. Any monk who approves of lifting that legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has done a legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably, and deserves to be released. He’s asking for that legal procedure to be lifted. The Sangha lifts that legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. Any monk who approves of lifting that legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the third time, I speak on this matter.

If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. I allow you to put monks in charge of building work that isn’t yet started or that’s partially complete. For a small dwelling, you should inspect the work and then put a monk in charge of the building work for five or six years. For a small stilt house, you should inspect the work and then put a monk in charge of the building work for seven or eight years. For a large dwelling or stilt house, you should inspect the work and then put a monk in charge of the building work for ten or twelve years.” On one occasion the monks put one person in charge of the building work on all the dwellings. “You shouldn’t put one person in charge of the building work on all the dwellings. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” On one occasion the monks put one person in charge of the building work on two dwellings. “You shouldn’t put one person in charge of the building work on two dwellings. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” On one occasion the monks who had taken on building work had someone else stay in that dwelling. “When you have taken on building work, you shouldn’t have someone else stay in that dwelling.

These make up the conduct in regard to restrooms. Sandals, tooth cleaner, And water for rinsing the mouth, seat; Congee, water, having washed, Put away, dirty, and village. Putting together, wet bowl; Attendant, and the navel and the knees, Evenly all around, belt. Putting together, rinsed, attendant, Not too far, he should receive;

he should be asked, ‘Will you make amends for that offense?’ If he says, ‘I will,’ he should be given the going forth. If he says, ‘I won’t,’ he should not. When he’s been given the going forth, he should be asked again, ‘Will you make amends for that offense?’ If he says, ‘I will,’ he should be given the full ordination. If he says, ‘I won’t,’ he should not. When he’s been given the full ordination, he should be asked again, ‘Will you make amends for that offense?’

If on the invitation day a monk is seized by kings, or by enemies of the monks, other monks should say to those enemies, ‘Listen, please release this monk for a short time, so that he can take part in the invitation ceremony.’ If they’re able to do this, it’s good. If not, they should say to those enemies, ‘Listen, please step aside for a moment while this monk passes on his invitation.’ If they’re able to do this, it’s good. If not, they should say to those enemies, ‘Listen, please take this monk outside the monastery zone for a short time while the Sangha does the invitation ceremony.’

If a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they do it with two motions and no announcement, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they do it with one announcement and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they do it with two announcements and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with one motion and no announcement, it is an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with two motions and no announcement, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with three motions and no announcement, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with four motions and no announcement, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with one announcement and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with two announcements and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure.

Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has done a legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably, and deserves to be released. He’s asking for that legal procedure to be lifted. The Sangha lifts that legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. Any monk who approves of lifting that legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. The Sangha has lifted that legal procedure of demotion against the monk Seyyasaka. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” The second section on the legal procedure of demotion is finished. 3. The legal procedure of banishment At one time the bad and shameless monks Assaji and Punabbasuka were staying at Kīṭāgiri.

If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” At one time monks who had taken on building work reserved what belonged to the Sangha. “When you have taken on building work, you shouldn’t reserve what belongs to the Sangha. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. I allow you to take one good bed.” On one occasion the monks put one who was outside the monastery zone in charge of building work. “You shouldn’t put one who’s outside the monastery zone in charge of building work. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” At one time the monks who had taken on building work reserved a dwelling at all times. “When you have taken on building work, you shouldn’t reserve a dwelling at all times.

If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with three announcements and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. If a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they do it with four announcements and no motion, it’s an illegitimate legal procedure. And what’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly? When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but the monks who should take part haven’t all arrived, and the consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, and the monks who should take part have arrived, but the consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, but someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but the monks who should take part haven’t all arrived, and consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, and the monks who should take part have arrived, but consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, but someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. And what’s a legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly?

I asked the Sangha to send me back to the beginning for that offense, I then asked the Sangha to give me probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When I had completed that probation, while deserving the trial period, I committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. I asked the Sangha to send me back to the beginning for that offense, I then asked the Sangha to give me probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When I had completed that probation, I asked the Sangha to give me the trial period of six days, While undertaking the trial period, I committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. I asked the Sangha to send me back to the beginning for that offense, I then asked the Sangha to give me probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When I had completed that probation, I asked the Sangha to give me the trial period of six days,

‘Will you give up that bad view?’ If he says, ‘I will,’ he should be given the going forth. If he says, ‘I won’t,’ he should not. When he’s been given the going forth, he should be asked again, ‘Will you give up that bad view?’ If he says, ‘I will,’ he should be given the full ordination. If he says, ‘I won’t,’ he should not. When he’s been given the full ordination, he should be asked again, ‘Will you give up that bad view?’ If he says, ‘I will,’ he should be readmitted.

“When there are five of you, you should do the invitation ceremony in the Sangha.” At one time on the invitation day, there were four monks staying in a certain monastery. “The Buddha has instructed that the invitation ceremony should be done in the Sangha when there are five monks. But there’s only four of us. So how should we do the invitation ceremony?” “When there are four of you, you should do the invitation ceremony with one another. And you should do it like this. A competent and capable monk should inform those monks: ‘Please, venerables, I ask you to listen. Today is the invitation ceremony.

When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly. And what’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly? When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they make the announcement first and put forward the motion afterwards, and the monks who should take part haven’t all arrived, and consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they make the announcement first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, but consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they make the announcement first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, but someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they make the announcements first and put forward the motion afterwards, and if the monks who should take part haven’t all arrived, and consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they make the announcements first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, but consent hasn’t been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they make the announcements first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, but someone present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by an incomplete assembly. And what’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly?

When I had completed that trial period, while deserving rehabilitation, I committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. I asked the Sangha to send me back to the beginning for that offense, I then asked the Sangha to give me probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When I had completed that probation, I asked the Sangha to give me the trial period of six days, I’ve now completed the trial period and ask the Sangha for rehabilitation.’ And he should ask a second and a third time. A competent and capable monk should then inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk Udāyī had committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for a half-month.

admitted to having been suspended for not making amends for an offense, admitted to having been suspended for not giving up a bad view, admitted to being a <i lang='pi' translate='no'>paṇḍaka</i>, admitted to being fake monks, admitted to previously having left to join the monastics of another religion, admitted to being an animal, admitted to being a matricide, admitted to being a patricide, admitted to being a murderer of a perfected one, admitted to having raped a nun,

And the sarong, upper robe, Bench, and with a seat. Foot, stool, and scraper, Drinking water, reciting, questioning; Dirty, he should clean it well, First the bowl and robe. Sitting mat and sheet, Mattress, and pillow; Bed, bench, support, Spittoon, and leaning board.

When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, but they make the announcement first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, but they make the announcements first and put forward the motion afterwards, yet the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate-like legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly. And what is a legitimate legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly? When a procedure requires one motion and one announcement, and they put forward the motion first and make the announcement afterwards, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure requires one motion and three announcements, and they put forward the motion first and make the announcements afterwards, and the monks who should take part have arrived, and consent has been brought for those who are eligible to give their consent, and no-one present objects to the decision, then it’s a legitimate legal procedure done by a unanimous assembly.” 4. Discussion of what can be done by a group of four, etc. “There are five kinds of sangha: a sangha of monks consisting of a group of four, a sangha of monks consisting of a group of five, a sangha of monks consisting of a group of ten, a sangha of monks consisting of a group of twenty, a sangha of monks consisting of a group of more than twenty. A Sangha of monks consisting of a group of four—unanimous, acting legitimately—is able to do all legal procedures except three: ordination, invitation, and rehabilitation.

He approached him, bowed, and said, “Venerable, have you received any almsfood?” “No, I haven’t.” “Come, let’s go to my house.” He took that monk to his house and gave him a meal. He then said, “Where are you going, venerable?” “I’m going to Sāvatthī to see the Buddha.” “Well then, would you please pay respect at the feet of the Buddha in my name and say, ‘Sir, the monastery at Kīṭāgiri has been corrupted. The bad and shameless monks Assaji and Punabbasuka are staying there.

He asked the Sangha to give him probation for a half-month for that offense, While on probation, he committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. He asked the Sangha to send him back to the beginning for that offense, He then asked the Sangha to give him probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When he had completed that probation, while deserving the trial period, he committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. He asked the Sangha to send him back to the beginning for that offense, He then asked the Sangha to give him probation for that offense, simultaneous with the probation for the previous offense, When he had completed that probation, he asked the Sangha to give him the trial period of six days for the three offenses, While he was undertaking the trial period, he committed one offense of intentional emission of semen, concealed for five days. He asked the Sangha to send him back to the beginning for that offense,