AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

He’s asking the Sangha for simultaneous probation according to the longest duration, that is, for the offense that was concealed for ten days. If the Sangha is ready, it should give him that simultaneous probation. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk so-and-so has committed a number of offenses entailing suspension: one concealed for one day … one for ten days. He’s asking the Sangha for simultaneous probation according to the longest duration, that is, for the offense that was concealed for ten days. The Sangha gives him that simultaneous probation. Any monk who approves of giving him

At that time there were monks who stepped into the dwellings with wet feet. The dwellings became dirty. “You shouldn’t step into a dwelling with wet feet. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” At that time there were monks who stepped into the dwellings with their sandals on. The dwellings became dirty. “You shouldn’t step into a dwelling with your sandals on. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” At that time there were monks who spat on treated floors. The coloring was spoiled.

with one who’s raped a nun as the fifth member, with one who’s caused a schism in the Sangha as the fifth member, with one who’s caused the Buddha to bleed as the fifth member, with a hermaphrodite as the fifth member, with one belonging to a different Buddhist sect as the fifth member, with one who’s outside the monastery zone as the fifth member, with one floating in the air by supernormal power as the fifth member, or with one who’s subject to the legal procedure as the fifth member, it’s invalid and not to be done.” Procedures requiring a group of five is finished.

For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. These monks, Assaji and Punabbasuka, are corrupters of families and badly behaved. Their bad behavior is seen and heard about, and the families corrupted by them are seen and heard about. The Sangha does a legal procedure of banishing them, prohibiting the monks Assaji and Punabbasuka from staying at Kīṭāgiri. Any monk who approves of doing this legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up.

“You shouldn’t spit on treated floors. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. I allow spittoons.” At that time the legs of the beds and benches scratched the treated floors. The coloring was spoiled. “You should wrap the legs in cloth.” At that time there were monks who leaned on treated walls. The coloring was spoiled. “You shouldn’t lean on treated walls. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. I allow leaning boards.”

He should sweep the place where the monks normally go: whether the assembly hall, under a roof cover, or at the foot of a tree. He should set out water for drinking and water for washing. He should prepare a seat, light a lamp, and sit down. If other monks arrive, he should do the invitation ceremony with them. If not, he should determine: ‘Today is my invitation ceremony.’ If he doesn’t make a determination, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. Wherever five monks are staying together, four shouldn’t do the invitation ceremony in the Sangha, while the invitation of the fifth is brought. If you do the invitation in the Sangha, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. Wherever four monks are staying together, three shouldn’t do the invitation ceremony with one another, while the invitation of the fourth is brought. If you do the invitation in this way, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. Wherever three monks are staying together, two shouldn’t do the invitation ceremony with each other, while the invitation of the third is brought. If you do the invitation in this way, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.

“If a legal procedure that requires a group of ten is done with a nun as the tenth member, it’s invalid and not to be done. If a legal procedure that requires a group of ten is done with a trainee nun as the tenth member, with a novice monk as the tenth member, with a novice nun as the tenth member, with one who’s renounced the training as the tenth member, with one who’s committed the worst kind of offense as the tenth member, with one who’s been ejected for not recognizing an offense as the tenth member, with one who’s been ejected for not making amends for an offense as the tenth member, with one who’s been ejected for not giving up a bad view as the tenth member, with a <i lang='pi' translate='no'>paṇḍaka</i> as the tenth member, with one living in the community by theft as the tenth member, with one who’s previously left to join the monastics of another religion as the tenth member, with an animal as the tenth member, with a matricide as the tenth member, with a patricide as the tenth member, with a murderer of a perfected one as the tenth member, with one who’s raped a nun as the tenth member, with one who’s caused a schism in the Sangha as the tenth member, with one who’s caused the Buddha to bleed as the tenth member, with a hermaphrodite as the tenth member, with one belonging to a different Buddhist sect as the tenth member, with one who’s outside the monastery zone as the tenth member, with one floating in the air by supernormal power as the tenth member, or with one who’s subject to the legal procedure as the tenth member, it’s invalid and not to be done.” Procedures requiring a group of ten is finished. “If a legal procedure that requires a group of twenty is done with a nun as the twentieth member, it’s invalid and not to be done. If a legal procedure that requires a group of twenty is done with a trainee nun as the twentieth member, with a novice monk as the twentieth member,

The Sangha has done the legal procedure of banishing the monks Assaji and Punabbasuka, prohibiting them from staying at Kīṭāgiri. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” The group of twelve on illegitimate legal procedures “When a legal procedure of banishment has three qualities, it’s illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done in the absence of the accused, it’s done without questioning the accused, it’s done without the admission of the accused. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t committed any offense, it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that isn’t clearable by confession, it’s done against one who’s confessed their offense. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having accused the person of their offense, it’s done without having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done without having charged the person with their offense. “When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done in the absence of the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly.

I have good will toward the Chabyāputtas, And toward the Kaṇhāgotamas. I have good will toward the legless, Toward the two-legged I have good will; I have good will toward the four-legged, And toward the many-legged. May the legless not hurt me, May the two-legged not hurt me. May the four-legged not hurt me, May the many-legged not hurt me.

Theravāda Collection on Monastic Law The Small Division The chapter on the cancellation of the Monastic Code 1. The request for the recitation of the Monastic Code At one time on the observance day, when the Buddha was staying at Sāvatthī in the Eastern Monastery, in Migāramāta’s stilt house, he was seated surrounded by the Sangha of monks. Then, when the night was well advanced and the first part of the night was over, Venerable Ānanda got up from his seat, arranged his upper robe over one shoulder, raise his joined palms, and said to the Buddha, “Sir, the night is well advanced and the first part of the night is over. The Sangha of monks has been seated for a long time. Please recite the Monastic Code.” The Buddha did not reply.

Perfected one, nun, and schism, And with blood, hermaphrodite. Without preceptor, and with the Sangha, Group, <i lang='pi' translate='no'>paṇḍaka</i>, and one without almsbowl; Without robe, both of them, Also the same three with borrowed. Hand, foot, hand and foot, Ear, nose, both of them; Finger, toe, and tendon, Joined, and hunchback, dwarf.

with a novice nun as the twentieth member, with one who’s renounced the training as the twentieth member, with one who’s committed the worst kind of offense as the twentieth member, with one who’s been ejected for not recognizing an offense as the twentieth member, with one who’s been ejected for not making amends for an offense as the twentieth member, with one who’s been ejected for not giving up a bad view as the twentieth member, with a <i lang='pi' translate='no'>paṇḍaka</i> as the twentieth member, with a fake monk as the twentieth member, with one who’s previously left to join the monastics of another religion as the twentieth member, with an animal as the twentieth member,

When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without questioning the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without the admission of the accused, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. “When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t committed any offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that isn’t clearable by confession, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s confessed their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. “When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having accused the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having charged the person with their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly.” The group of twelve on illegitimate legal procedures is finished. The group of twelve on legitimate legal procedures

A competent and capable monk should then inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk so-and-so has committed a number of offenses entailing suspension: one concealed for one day … ten for ten days. He’s asking the Sangha for simultaneous probation according to the longest duration, that is, for all the offenses that were concealed the longest. If the Sangha is ready, it should give him that simultaneous probation. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The monk so-and-so has committed a number of offenses entailing suspension: one concealed for one day …

All beings, all creatures, All living beings everywhere, May they all have good fortune, May none meet with anything bad. The Buddha is unlimited, The Teaching is unlimited, The Sangha is unlimited. But creeping animals are limited: Snakes, scorpions, centipedes, Spiders, lizards, and mice.

He should approach a single monk, arrange his upper robe over one shoulder, squat on his heels, raise his joined palms, and say: ‘I’ve committed such-and-such an offense. I confess it.’ The other should say, ‘Do you recognize the offense?’ — ‘Yes, I recognize it.’ — ‘You should restrain yourself in the future.’ On the invitation day, a monk may be unsure if he’s committed an offense. He should approach a single monk, arrange his upper robe over one shoulder, squat on his heels, raise his joined palms, and say: ‘I’m unsure if I’ve committed such-and-such an offense. I’ll make amends for it when I’m sure.’ They can then do the invitation ceremony.

with a matricide as the twentieth member, with a patricide as the twentieth member, with a murderer of a perfected one as the twentieth member, with one who’s raped a nun as the twentieth member, with one who’s caused a schism in the Sangha as the twentieth member, with one who’s caused the Buddha to bleed as the twentieth member, with a hermaphrodite as the twentieth member, with one belonging to a different Buddhist sect as the twentieth member, with one who’s outside the monastery zone as the twentieth member, with one floating in the air by supernormal power as the twentieth member,

“When a legal procedure of banishment has three qualities, it’s legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done with the admission of the accused. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done against one who hasn’t confessed their offense. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done after having accused the person of their offense, it’s done after having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done after having charged the person with their offense. “When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done with the admission of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. “When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of banishment has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly.

ten for ten days. He’s asking the Sangha for simultaneous probation according to the longest duration, that is, for all the offenses that were concealed the longest. The Sangha gives him that simultaneous probation. Any monk who approves of giving him that simultaneous probation should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. … The Sangha has given monk so-and-so simultaneous probation according to the longest duration, that is, for all the offenses that were concealed the longest. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” Probation for two months

If the Sangha is ready, it should appoint monk so-and-so as designator of meals. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha appoints monk so-and-so as designator of meals. Any monk who approves of appointing monk so-and-so as designator of meals should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. The Sangha has appointed monk so-and-so as designator of meals. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” The monks who were designator of meals thought, “How should we designate the meals?”