AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

There’s no offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. They don’t know there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. Perceiving that they’re acting according to the Teaching and the Monastic Law, perceiving that the assembly is complete although it’s not, they do the invitation ceremony. When they’ve just finished, and none of the gathering has left, a greater number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, those monks should do the invitation ceremony once more. There’s no offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. They don’t know

or one who’s blind and mute and deaf doesn’t have the attributes needed to be admitted, but if the Sangha admits him, his admittance succeeds.” The first section for recitation on the village of Vāsabha is finished. 7. Discussion of illegitimate legal procedures, etc. “It may be that a monk doesn’t have any offense he needs to recognize, yet a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You’ve committed an offense. Do you recognize it?’ ‘I haven’t committed any offense that I should recognize,’ yet the Sangha ejects him for not recognizing an offense, then the legal procedure is illegitimate. It may be that a monk doesn’t have any offense he needs to make amends for,

“When a monk has five qualities, a legal procedure of banishing him should be lifted: he doesn’t give the full ordination; he doesn’t give formal support; he doesn’t have a novice monk attend on him; he doesn’t accept being appointed as an instructor of the nuns; he doesn’t instruct the nuns, whether appointed or not. When a monk has another five qualities, a procedure of banishing him should be lifted: he doesn’t commit the same offense for which the Sangha did the procedure of banishing him; he doesn’t commit an offense similar to the one for which the Sangha did the procedure of banishing him; he doesn’t commit an offense worse than the one for which the Sangha did the procedure of banishing him; he doesn’t criticize the procedure; he doesn’t criticize those who did the procedure. When a monk has eight qualities, a procedure of banishing him should be lifted: he doesn’t cancel the observance-day ceremony of a regular monk; he doesn’t cancel the invitation ceremony of a regular monk; he doesn’t direct a regular monk; he doesn’t give instructions to a regular monk; he doesn’t get permission from a regular monk to correct him; he doesn’t accuse a regular monk of an offense; he doesn’t remind a regular monk of an offense; he doesn’t associate inappropriately with other monks.” The group of eighteen on to be lifted is finished. “And this is how it should be lifted. After approaching the Sangha, the monk who’s had a legal procedure of banishment done against himself should arrange his upper robe over one shoulder, pay respect at the feet of the senior monks, squat on his heels, raise his joined palms, and say,

“I allow a bowl rack.” On one occasion there were monks who had put their bowls on the edge of a bench. They fell down and broke. “You shouldn’t put your almsbowl on the edge of a bench. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” On one occasion there were monks who had put their bowls on the edge of a ledge. They fell down and broke. “You shouldn’t put your almsbowl on the edge of a ledge. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” At that time the monks put their bowls upside down on the ground.

<i lang='pi' translate='no'>Bundi</i>, and having crooked legs; Detachable, square bench, about a tall one. And sofa, cane bench, Small bench with cloth, ram-like legs; Many legs, plank, stools, And just a bench of straw. High, snake, supports, And supports of eight fingerbreadths; String, cross weaving, cloth, Cotton-down quilt, half the size of the body.

an offense entailing confession, an offense entailing acknowledgment, or an offense of wrong conduct. What are the five kinds of cancelings of the Monastic Code that are legitimate? One cancels the Monastic Code, having grounds, for an offense entailing expulsion, an offense entailing suspension, an offense entailing confession, an offense entailing acknowledgment, or an offense of wrong conduct. “What are the six kinds of cancelings of the Monastic Code that are illegitimate? One cancels the Monastic Code, without grounds, for the failure in morality of one who hasn’t failed, the failure in morality of one who has failed,

does not confess it, disclose it, make it plain, make it known—either in the midst of the Sangha, in the midst of a group, or to an individual. He is lying in full awareness: what is there for lying in full awareness? There is an act of wrong conduct. Is called an obstacle by the Buddha: an obstacle for what? It is an obstacle for reaching the first absorption, the second absorption, the third absorption, the fourth absorption; an obstacle for reaching the wholesome qualities of absorption, release, stillness, attainment, renunciation, escape, seclusion. for that reason. who knows, who perceives. Is seeking purification:

there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. Perceiving that they’re acting according to the Teaching and the Monastic Law, perceiving that the assembly is complete although it’s not, they do the invitation ceremony. When they’ve just finished, and none of the gathering has left, an equal number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, and the late arrivals should invite in the presence of the others. There’s no offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. They don’t know there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. Perceiving that they’re acting according to the Teaching and the Monastic Law, perceiving that the assembly is complete although it’s not, they do the invitation ceremony. When they’ve just finished, and none of the gathering has left, a smaller number of resident monks arrive.

Saying, “Yes,” they did just that. When people saw those sweet-voiced and articulate boys, they used their services even if they did not really want to. And they gave much in return. Soon the boys had collected a large amount of salt, oil, rice, and fresh food. When the Buddha eventually arrived at Ātumā, he stayed in a dwelling made of husk. The following morning that monk who had gone forth when old had much congee prepared and brought it to the Buddha, saying, “Sir, please accept the congee.” When Buddhas know what is going on, sometimes they ask and sometimes not. They know the right time to ask and when not to ask. Buddhas ask when it is beneficial, otherwise they do not, for Buddhas are incapable of doing what is unbeneficial. Buddhas question the monks for two reasons: to give a teaching or to lay down a training rule. The Buddha then said to him,

yet a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You’ve committed an offense. Make amends for it.’ ‘I haven’t committed any offense that I should make amends for,’ yet the Sangha ejects him for not making amends for an offense, then the legal procedure is illegitimate. It may be that a monk doesn’t have any bad view he needs to give up, yet a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You have a bad view that you need to give up.’ ‘I don’t have any bad view that I should give up,’ yet the Sangha ejects him for not giving up a bad view,

‘Venerables, the Sangha has done a legal procedure of banishing me. I’m now conducting myself properly and suitably, and deserve to be released. I ask for that legal procedure to be lifted.’ And he should ask a second and a third time. A competent and capable monk should then inform the Sangha: ‘Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has done a legal procedure of banishing monk so-and-so. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably, and deserves to be released. He’s asking for that legal procedure to be lifted. If the Sangha is ready, it should lift that legal procedure of banishing him. This is the motion. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has done a legal procedure of banishing monk so-and-so. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably, and deserves to be released. He’s asking for that legal procedure to be lifted.

The edges of the bowls were scratched. “I allow a spread of grass.” The grass was eaten by termites. “I allow a cloth.” The cloth was eaten by termites. “I allow a platform for bowls.” The bowls fell off the platform and broke. “I allow a storage container for almsbowls.” The bowls were scratched in the storage containers. “I allow a bowl bag.”

Hilltop fair, and also mattresses, And also furniture cloth; Upholstered, sank down, And removed and taken away. Multi-colored lines, and multi-colored lines by hand, Was allowed by the Buddha; And also in the dwellings of monastics of other religions, Husk, and soft clay. Sap, trowel, bran, Mustard seed, beeswax;

the failure in conduct of one who hasn’t failed, the failure in conduct of one who has failed, the failure in view of one who hasn’t failed, or the failure in view of one who has failed. What are the six kinds of cancelings of the Monastic Code that are legitimate? One cancels the Monastic Code, having grounds, for the failure in morality of one who hasn’t failed, the failure in morality of one who has failed, the failure in conduct of one who hasn’t failed, the failure in conduct of one who has failed, the failure in view of one who hasn’t failed, or the failure in view of one who has failed. “What are the seven kinds of cancelings of the Monastic Code that are illegitimate? One cancels the Monastic Code, without grounds, for an offense entailing expulsion, an offense entailing suspension, a serious offense, an offense entailing confession, an offense entailing acknowledgment, an offense of wrong conduct, or an offense of wrong speech. What are the seven kinds of cancelings of the Monastic Code that are legitimate?

You can have it, if you wish.” “There’s no need. You deserve it and you should have it.” Uruvelā Kassapa thought, “The Great Ascetic is powerful and mighty, in that he dismissed me, then took a fruit from a rose-apple tree, and still arrived first in the fire hut. But he’s not a perfected one like me.” The Buddha ate his meal and continued to stay in the same forest grove. The next morning Uruvelā Kassapa went to the Buddha and said, “It’s time, Great Ascetic, the meal is ready.” “You just go ahead, Kassapa, I’ll come.” After dismissing him, he took a fruit from a mango tree not far from the rose-apple tree … he took a fruit from an emblic myrobalan tree not far from the mango tree … he took a fruit from a chebulic myrobalan tree not far from the emblic myrobalan tree …

is desiring to be cleared, is desiring purity. one that has been committed, or one that has not been cleared after being committed. Should reveal it: should reveal it either in the midst of the Sangha, in the midst of a group, or to an individual. When it’s revealed, he will be at ease: at ease for what? He will be at ease for reaching the first absorption, the second absorption, the third absorption, the forth absorption; at ease for reaching the wholesome qualities of absorption, release, stillness, attainment, renunciation, escape, seclusion. When they heard that the Buddha required the recitation of the Monastic Code, some monks recited it daily.

In such a case, the invitations of those who already have invited are valid, and the late arrivals should invite in the presence of the others. There’s no offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery. They don’t know there are other resident monks who haven’t arrived. Perceiving that they’re acting according to the Teaching and the Monastic Law, perceiving that the assembly is complete although it’s not, they do the invitation ceremony. When they’ve just finished, and only some members of the gathering have left, a greater number of resident monks arrive. In such a case, those monks should do the invitation ceremony once more. There’s no offense for those who already have invited. On the invitation day, five or more resident monks may have gathered together in a certain monastery.

“Where does this congee come from?” and the Buddha rebuked him, “It’s not suitable, foolish man, it’s not proper, it’s not worthy of a monastic, it’s not allowable, it’s not to be done. How can you who have gone forth encourage others in what’s unallowable? This will affect people’s confidence …” After rebuking him, he gave a teaching and addressed the monks: “You shouldn’t encourage others to do what’s unallowable. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct. And if you were previously a barber, you shouldn’t carry barber equipment around. If you do, you commit an offense of wrong conduct.” When the Buddha had stayed at Ātumā for as long as he liked, he set out wandering toward Sāvatthī.

then the legal procedure is illegitimate. It may be that a monk doesn’t have any offense he needs to recognize, nor any he needs to make amends for, yet a Sangha, several monks, or an individual monk accuses him, saying: ‘You’ve committed an offense. Do you recognize it? Make amends for it.’ ‘I haven’t committed any offense that I should recognize, nor any I should make amends for,’ yet the Sangha ejects him for not recognizing an offense or for not making amends for it, then the legal procedure is illegitimate. It may be that a monk doesn’t have any offense he needs to recognize, nor any bad view he needs to give up,

The Sangha lifts that legal procedure of banishing him. Any monk who approves of lifting that legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. For the second time, I speak on this matter. … For the third time, I speak on this matter. Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has done a legal procedure of banishing monk so-and-so. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably, and deserves to be released. He’s asking for that legal procedure to be lifted. The Sangha lifts that legal procedure of banishing him. Any monk who approves of lifting that legal procedure should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up.