AIブッダ 禅 経典データベース

“When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t committed any offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that isn’t clearable by confession, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s confessed their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. “When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having accused the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also illegitimate, contrary to the Monastic Law, and improperly disposed of: it’s done without having charged the person with their offense, it’s done illegitimately, it’s done by an incomplete assembly.” The group of twelve on illegitimate legal procedures of ejection for not making amends for an offense is finished. The group of twelve on legitimate legal procedures “When a legal procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has three qualities, it’s legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done with the admission of the accused.

He conceals the offenses he remembers, but not those he doesn’t remember. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having remembered all of them, he conceals none of them. He’s to be sent back to the beginning. He’s then to be given probation according to the length of the concealment of those offenses and simultaneously with the probation for the previous offenses. It may be that a monk on probation commits a number of offenses entailing suspension. He remembers some of them, but not others. He conceals the offenses he remembers, but not those he doesn’t remember. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having remembered all the offenses, he doesn’t conceal those offenses he previously remembered,

Please, venerables, I ask the Sangha to listen. The Sangha has overturned the bowl against Vaḍḍha the Licchavī, prohibiting him from interacting with the Sangha. He’s now conducting himself properly and suitably so as to deserve to be released, and is asking the Sangha to turn the bowl upright for him. The Sangha turns the bowl upright for Vaḍḍha the Licchavī, allowing him to interact with the Sangha. Any monk who approves of turning the bowl upright for Vaḍḍha the Licchavī should remain silent. Any monk who doesn’t approve should speak up. The Sangha has turned the bowl upright for Vaḍḍha the Licchavī, allowing him to interact with the Sangha. The Sangha approves and is therefore silent. I’ll remember it thus.’” Stepping on cloth When the Buddha had stayed at Vesālī for as long as he liked, he set out wandering toward the country of Bhaggā.

so too, while he was sitting right there, he experienced the stainless vision of the Truth: “Anything that has a beginning has an end.” He had seen the Truth, had reached, understood, and penetrated it. He had gone beyond doubt and uncertainty, had attained to confidence, and had become independent of others in the Teacher’s instruction. And he said to the Buddha, “Wonderful, sir, wonderful! Just as one might set upright what’s overturned, or reveal what’s hidden, or show the way to one who’s lost, or bring a lamp into the darkness so that one with eyes might see what’s there— just so has the Buddha made the Teaching clear in many ways. I go for refuge to the Buddha, the Teaching, and the Sangha of monks. Please accept me as a lay follower who’s gone for refuge for life.” The Buddha then said to him,

There’s no offense for the one who is conveying the purity. And if, after the purity has been passed on to him, the monk who is conveying the purity reaches the Sangha, but deliberately doesn’t announce the purity, then the purity has been brought. But there’s an offense of wrong conduct for the one who is conveying the purity.” 21. Discussion on giving consent The Buddha addressed the monks: “Gather, monks, for the Sangha to do a legal procedure.” A monk said to the Buddha, “Sir, there’s a sick monk. He hasn’t come.” “A sick monk should give his consent. And he should give like this.

Some monks regard it as a serious offense, but others as an offense entailing suspension. The monks who regard it as a serious offense should take that monk aside and deal with him according to the rule. They should then approach the Sangha and say: ‘This monk has made amends for the offense he has committed. If the Sangha is ready, it should do the invitation ceremony.’ On the invitation day, a monk may have committed a serious offense. Some monks regard it as a serious offense, but others as an offense entailing confession. … Some monks regard it as a serious offense, but others as an offense entailing acknowledgment. … Some monks regard it as a serious offense, but others as an offense of wrong conduct. … Some monks regard it as a serious offense, but others as an offense of wrong speech. The monks who regard it as a serious offense should take that monk aside and deal with him according to the rule. They should then approach the Sangha and say:

When he is outside the monastery zone, he thinks, “I’ll deal with that expectation right here. I won’t return.” He then deals with that expectation, but it is disappointed. For that monk the robe season ends when the expectation is disappointed. A monk who has participated in the robe-making ceremony leaves the monastery while expecting more robe-cloth, thinking, “I’ll return.” When he is outside the monastery zone, he deals with that expectation, getting what he had expected. He then has the robe made. When the robe has been made, he still thinks, “I’ll return,” but he remains outside the monastery zone until the end of the robe season. For that monk the robe season ends while he is outside the monastery zone. A monk who has participated in the robe-making ceremony leaves the monastery while expecting more robe-cloth, thinking, “I’ll return.” When he is outside the monastery zone, he deals with that expectation, getting what he had expected.

16. Discussion of the lifting of the legal procedure of condemnation “It may be, monks, that the Sangha has done a legal procedure of condemnation against a monk, that he then conducts himself properly and suitably so as to deserve to be released, and that he then asks for the lifting of that procedure. The monks consider, ‘The Sangha has done a legal procedure of condemnation against this monk. He has conducted himself properly and suitably so as to deserve to be released, and now asks for the lifting of that procedure. Well then, let’s lift that procedure.’ They lift that procedure— illegitimately and with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha has lifted a legal procedure of condemnation against this monk—illegitimately and with an incomplete assembly.

When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done against one who hasn’t confessed their offense. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done after having accused the person of their offense, it’s done after having reminded the person of their offense, it’s done after having charged the person with their offense. “When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done in the presence of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done with the questioning of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done with the admission of the accused, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. “When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who’s committed an offense that’s clearable by confession, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done against one who hasn’t confessed their offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly. “When a procedure of ejection for not making amends for an offense has another three qualities, it’s also legitimate, in accordance with the Monastic Law, and properly disposed of: it’s done after accusing the person of their offense, it’s done legitimately, it’s done by a unanimous assembly.

but conceals those he didn’t remember. He’s to be sent back to the beginning. He’s then to be given probation according to the length of the concealment of those offenses and simultaneously with the probation for the previous offenses. It may be that a monk on probation commits a number of offenses entailing suspension. He remembers some of them, but not others. He conceals the offenses he remembers, but not those he doesn’t remember. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having remembered all of them, he conceals those offenses he previously remembered, but not those he didn’t remember. He’s to be sent back to the beginning.

“Don’t go back along this path, go along that one.” And he sent him down a different path. The two men thought, “Why is it taking that one man so long to arrive?” As they were walking along that path in the opposite direction, they saw the Buddha seated at the foot of a tree. They approached him, bowed, and sat down. The Buddha gave them a progressive talk … and they had become independent of others in the Teacher’s instruction. And they said to the Buddha, “Wonderful, sir … Please accept us as lay followers who have gone for refuge for life.” The Buddha then said to them,

‘This monk has made amends for the offense he has committed. If the Sangha is ready, it should do the invitation ceremony.’ On the invitation day, a monk may have committed an offense entailing confession. … an offense entailing acknowledgment. … an offense of wrong conduct. … an offense of wrong speech. Some monks regard it as an offense of wrong speech, but others as an offense entailing suspension. The monks who regard it as an offense of wrong speech should take that monk aside and deal with him according to the rule. They should then approach the Sangha and say: ‘This monk has made amends for the offense he has committed. If the Sangha is ready, it should do the invitation ceremony.’

He then has the robe made. When the robe has been made, he still thinks, “I’ll return,” and they reach the end of the robe season together. For that monk the robe season ends together with the other monks. The group of twelve on “as expected” is finished. 11. The group of twelve on business A monk who has participated in the robe-making ceremony leaves the monastery on some business. When he is outside the monastery zone, he comes to expect more robe-cloth. He deals with that expectation. He gets robe-cloth, but not what he had expected. He thinks, “I’ll make the robe right here. I won’t return.” He then has the robe made.

Well then, let’s lift that procedure.’ They lift that procedure— illegitimately but with a unanimous assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha has lifted a legal procedure of condemnation against this monk—illegitimately but with a unanimous assembly. Well then, let’s lift that procedure.’ They lift that procedure— legitimately but with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery.

He’s then to be given probation according to the length of the concealment of those offenses and simultaneously with the probation for the previous offenses. It may be that a monk on probation commits a number of offenses entailing suspension. He remembers some of them, but not others. He conceals the offenses he remembers, but not those he doesn’t remember. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having remembered all of them, he conceals all of them. He’s to be sent back to the beginning. He’s then to be given probation according to the length of the concealment of those offenses and simultaneously with the probation for the previous offenses. “It may be that a monk on probation commits a number of offenses entailing suspension. He’s sure of some of them, but unsure of others.

“Don’t go back along this path, go along that one.” And he sent them down a different path. The four men … the eight men … the sixteen men thought, “Why is it taking those eight men so long to arrive?” As they were walking along that path in the opposite direction, they saw the Buddha seated at the foot of a tree. They approached him, bowed, and sat down. The Buddha gave them a progressive talk … and they had become independent of others in the Teacher’s instruction. And they said to the Buddha, “Wonderful, sir …

On the invitation day, a monk may have committed an offense of wrong speech. Some monks regard it as an offense of wrong speech, but others as a serious offense. … Some monks regard it as an offense of wrong speech, but others as an offense entailing confession. … Some monks regard it as an offense of wrong speech, but others as an offense entailing acknowledgment. … Some monks regard it as an offense of wrong speech, but others as an offense of wrong conduct. The monks who regard it as an offense of wrong speech should take that monk aside and deal with him according to the rule. They should then approach the Sangha and say: ‘This monk has made amends for the offense he has committed. If the Sangha is ready, it should do the invitation ceremony.’” 24. Setting aside an offense, etc. “It may happen on the invitation day that a monk announces in the midst of the Sangha:

For that monk the robe season ends when the robe is finished. A monk who has participated in the robe-making ceremony leaves the monastery on some business. When he is outside the monastery zone, he comes to expect more robe-cloth. He deals with that expectation. He gets robe-cloth, but not what he had expected. He thinks, “I won’t make a robe, and I won’t return.” For that monk the robe season ends when he makes that decision. A monk who has participated in the robe-making ceremony leaves the monastery on some business. When he is outside the monastery zone, he comes to expect more robe-cloth. He deals with that expectation. He gets robe-cloth, but not what he had expected. He thinks, “I’ll make the robe right here. I won’t return.”

There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha has lifted a legal procedure of condemnation against this monk—legitimately but with an incomplete assembly. Well then, let’s lift that procedure.’ They lift that procedure— in a legitimate-like way and with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha has lifted a legal procedure of condemnation against this monk—in a legitimate-like way and with an incomplete assembly. Well then, let’s lift that procedure.’ They lift that procedure—

He conceals the offenses he’s sure of, but not those he’s unsure of. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having become sure of all of them, he conceals none of them. He’s to be sent back to the beginning. He’s then to be given probation according to the length of the concealment of those offenses and simultaneously with the probation for the previous offenses. It may be that a monk on probation commits a number of offenses entailing suspension. He’s sure of some of them, but unsure of others. He conceals the offenses he’s sure of, but not those he’s unsure of. He then disrobes. Being reordained and having become sure of all of them, he doesn’t conceal those offenses he was previously sure of,