He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is illegitimate … He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is legitimate … He is unsure about what he says and is unsure about the schism. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he too is irredeemably destined to an eon in hell. Again, a monk proclaims what’s in accordance with the Teaching as contrary to it, what’s contrary to the Monastic Law as being in accordance with it, what’s in accordance with the Monastic Law as contrary to it, what hasn’t been spoken by the Buddha as spoken by him, what’s been spoken by the Buddha as not spoken by him,